About faye resnick :faye resnick image, video

 A correspondent has written to tell me that after reading here of my dispute with Marla in "SATURDAY NIGHT ON RESTAURANT ROW" she went back and re-read Resnick's book, "Nicole Brown Simpson, A Life Interrupted." From this, she comes to a similar opinion as mine, but for slightly different reasons.

Faye Resnick: Camille Grammer Dinner Party Fight! (VIDEO

Guests at Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Camille Grammer's dinner party were treated to a hearty, heaping serving of – you guessed it – drama.

On Thursday night's episode of the Bravo series, the housewife – who filed for divorce from husband Kelsey Grammer in July – threw the affair at her Malibu home with intentions of making amends with the ladies after a tense trip to Manhattan. But it was a guest of fellow housewife – and frenemy – Kyle Richards that made it a dinner party from hell, as the episode is appropriately titled.

    


Richards brought along Faye Resnick, co-author of the 1994 book Nicole Brown Simpson: The Private Diary of a Life Interrupted, which was published amidst the hype of the O.J. Simpson murder trial. She later stripped down for Playboy after the publicity she received from the book.

"You know how I know her?" Grammer says in the episode. "I saw her naked on Playboy.

She adds: "I thought you looked amazing," before calling her "morally corrupt" in her confessional, alluding to Resnick's friendship with Nicole Brown Simpson.

It's a bold, dinner-table move – coming from a fellow Bunny. Grammer, 42, had her close-up, too, in the magazine, a point Richards brings up.

"We got into this conversation – how I posed for Playboy too," she says. "But I was in my early 20s, and it wasn't coming off of a big murder trial that my girlfriend was killed [in]. "Those people I don't understand, and I don't want to associate with."

But Richards had a few words of wisdom for Grammer: "Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones," she says. "And she threw a big boulder."

  RESNICK'S THESIS: Resnick claims -- vehemently -- that Simpson killed his ex-wife, and produces a sketchy account of her relationship to the couple, especially Nicole, to support the idea. Resnick claims to have been Nicole's "best friend" (though I dispute that she was that in the period before 1994), and she mentions several interactions she herself had with Simpson in the weeks before the crimes that she thinks portended his violent attack on Nicole on the night of June 12th, 1994.

    Although no-J's think Simpson is guilty, they do not rest most of their case on Resnick, but on the abundant physical evidence that shows Simpson was at Bundy on the murder night, and other accounts of his abusive behavior toward Nicole in the several years beforehand. (Marla herself puts more stock in Resnick's claim than most no-J's, perhaps because Marla had a personal encounter with Faye.) Pro-J's are dismissive of Resnick as an opportunist who cashed in on her friend's death, and would say anything to make a buck. The public has regarded the book as titillating, but as unreliable as a supermarket tabloid.

I have asserted that before 1994 (and perhaps even right up until the weeks just before the crime) Faye Resnick was not Nicole's "best friend," as Faye has loudly proclaimed, but that Cora Fischman occupied that role in Nicole's life. We see (p. 210 in Faye's book) that when she is talking about the disposition of Nicole's house keys, Faye says, " Nicole had four sets of keys. One set was for Elvie, the maid. Cora always had one set..." And of course, Nicole had a set. Together with the missing keys, that is four sets. Now, I assert that if Nicole had one set of house keys to give to someone outside of the household, she would give it to her "best friend," and that was Cora Fischman, not Faye Resnick. (Faye explains the situation by saying Cora had a set "because her kids where there a lot," but this is unconvincing to me.)